<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<copyright>Copyright 1998-2012 Tweakers.net</copyright>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:13:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:13:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://tweakers.net/reviews/76</docs>
		<description>Tweakblogs.net is the weblog service provided by Tweakers.net, the largest hardwaresite and techcommunity in the Netherlands.</description>
		
		<language>en</language>
		<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/cat/63</link>
		<title>Crisp&#39;s blog - Tweakers.net</title>
		<webMaster>frontpage@tweakers.net</webMaster>
		<item>
			<title>JSMin+ version 1.4</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6861/jsmin+-version-14.html</link>
			<description>Version 1.4 of JSMin+ is available for download. Because we are still actively using JSMin+ at Tweakers.net we did make some minor improvements since I released version 1.3 for the public now more than 2 years ago, but I never felt those improvements warranted a new public version. Until now. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>7</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6861/jsmin+-version-14.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6861</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lazy-loading print stylesheets - part II</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6441/lazy-loading-print-stylesheets-part-ii.html</link>
			<description>Even though some browsers now defer downloading print stylesheets I thought this still wasn&#39;t enough. I was more thinking in line of: why not download the print stylesheet *only* when the user has actually requested a print-out? Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6441/lazy-loading-print-stylesheets-part-ii.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6441</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Code Groen!</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6280/code-groen!.html</link>
			<description>&#38;quot;Werkt uw website naar behoren in Internet Explorer 9?&#38;quot; dat was het onderwerp van de mail die ik vandaag mocht ontvangen met betrekking tot onze site http://tweakers.net. 

&#38;quot;De afgelopen weken hebben wij de meest populaire websites van Nederland gecontroleerd op webstandaarden zoals die ook door Internet Explorer 9 ondersteund worden. Uw website hoort hier ook bij. Hieronder ziet u onze bevindingen. We hanteren drie gradaties: Groen, Oranje en Rood.&#38;quot;

En hoe ziet dat er uit? Lees verder &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6280/code-groen!.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/6280</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lazy-loading print stylesheets</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5650/lazy-loading-print-stylesheets.html</link>
			<description>The thought crossed my mind before, but I never acted on it: lazy-load your print stylesheets! So now I took the bull by its horns and implemented it for Tweakers.net. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5650/lazy-loading-print-stylesheets.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5650</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Internet Explorer 9 is the best HTML5 browser!</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5480/internet-explorer-9-is-the-best-html5-browser!.html</link>
			<description>Yes, really, look for yourself! It&#39;s the official result of the W3C HTML5 Test Suite!

Of course, we at Tweakers.net already knew that. We have even dedicated a special page to Internet Explorer 9 and all its goodness and have &#39;optimized&#39; some of our very own site-features for IE9 (see the two demo&#39;s at the bottom of the showcase page). And now even W3C declares IE9 (latest platform preview version) the most HTML5 compliant browser available at this date! Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5480/internet-explorer-9-is-the-best-html5-browser!.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5480</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Do you have javascript disabled?</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5426/do-you-have-javascript-disabled.html</link>
			<description>Every time you create a new hot DHTML AJAX Web2.0 HTML5 feature that at least involves a certain amount of javascript the same question arises: how do you build this feature with accessibility in mind? Is it a very important feature and should you cater to the lowest denominator and build using progressive enhancement, or can you use graceful degradation and/or supply a lower-level alternative, or is it just a gimmick and is it ok to ignore part of your audience? Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5426/do-you-have-javascript-disabled.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5426</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IE9 Pinned Sites; a lot of cruft in your &#60;head&#62;</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5100/ie9-pinned-sites-a-lot-of-cruft-in-your-kleiner-dan-head-groter-dan.html</link>
			<description>While Microsoft is generally going into the right direction with version 9 of Internet Explorer when it comes to standards compliance they couldn&#39;t resist to built-in some new proprietary features. One of those is the so-called &#39;Pinned Sites&#39; feature which makes it possible to &#39;pin&#39; websites to the taskbar in Windows 7 making them part of the desktop as if they were applications.

Even though this is actually a nice feature if you happen to use Windows 7, the actual implementation does have some flaws. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5100/ie9-pinned-sites-a-lot-of-cruft-in-your-kleiner-dan-head-groter-dan.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5100</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are you watching the banners? At least the banners are watching you!</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4860/are-you-watching-the-banners-at-least-the-banners-are-watching-you!.html</link>
			<description>When was the last time you looked at a banner? Provided you don&#39;t already use a banner blocker, and I don&#39;t mean just noticed that there was a banner (some flashing moving thing on top of the page or on the side, or maybe even covering the content you were just about to start reading and making you race for the close button), but really looked at it? Maybe even clicked it? And if you did, do you look at banners all the time? Well, don&#39;t worry if you don&#39;t; at least banners know when you are not looking, and they&#39;re telling it to the advertisers. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4860/are-you-watching-the-banners-at-least-the-banners-are-watching-you!.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4860</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tweakblogs: idee&#235;n voor features</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4065/tweakblogs-ideeen-voor-features.html</link>
			<description>Mijn medeblogger Coltrui vroeg U al eerder om input en nu is het mijn beurt om, na de eerdere verbeteringen aan ons fabeltastische blogplatform, eens wat andere ideetjes in Uw aangezicht te spiegelen  Lees verder &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>9</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4065/tweakblogs-ideeen-voor-features.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4065</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tweakblogs: stats, quotes &#38; performance</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4005/tweakblogs-stats-quotes-en-performance.html</link>
			<description>Gisteren en vandaag zijn er wat wijzigingen doorgevoerd aan de Tweakblogs. De titel verklapt het eigenlijk al een beetje en wellicht was het de blogeigenaren ook al opgevallen, maar hierbij toch een korte blogpost om een en ander toe te lichten  Lees verder &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>9</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4005/tweakblogs-stats-quotes-en-performance.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4005</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CSRF protection with &#39;self-validating&#39; tokens</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3928/csrf-protection-with-self-validating-tokens.html</link>
			<description>Cross-site Request Forgery is a very common social exploit method to make people unknowingly do things on their own behalf on a targeted website. It&#39;s the number four on the 2010 CWE/SANS Top 25 Most Dangerous Programming Errors list.

The main reason this problem exists in most websites is the fact that they don&#39;t check the origin of an incoming request that results in an action on that website. There are several ways a website can protect itself against these sort of attacks and I&#39;m going to explain the way we, at Tweakers.net, have implemented our own protection method. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3928/csrf-protection-with-self-validating-tokens.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3928</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Die IE6, die!</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3535/die-ie6-die!.html</link>
			<description>The Dutch nowadays are a conservative kind of people; they don&#39;t like to stick out their necks when it comes to radical changes. They much rather prefer to keep everything as it was. But when a greater power tells them to jump, the Dutch will gladly ask &#38;quot;how high?&#38;quot; Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3535/die-ie6-die!.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3535</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Clientside performance no priority for Dutch websites</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3301/clientside-performance-no-priority-for-dutch-websites.html</link>
			<description>As a senior developer at Tweakers.net and being specialized in frontend development I always take clientside performance very seriously. Even if your backend code is optimized to the bone, a slow rendering frontend can still spoil the whole experience for your visitors, and a bad first impression will make your visitors go elsewhere. A couple of recent articles on some other Dutch ICT-centered newssites made me wonder if they are taking clientside performance just as seriously. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3301/clientside-performance-no-priority-for-dutch-websites.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3301</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Spam @ tweakblogs</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3127/spam-tweakblogs.html</link>
			<description>De Tweakblogs lijken de laatste tijd steeds meer in het vizier te liggen van spammers. Van de week heb ik al meer dan 300 spamreacties op (veelal oudere) blogposts getrashed, en vandaag heb ik alweer 60 anonieme spamreacties kunnen trashen. Tijd voor actie dus! Lees verder &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>9</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3127/spam-tweakblogs.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3127</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Inline validatie met een Ajax sausje</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3029/inline-validatie-met-een-ajax-sausje.html</link>
			<description>Onlangs las ik een interessant artikel op A List Apart over de gebruiks(on)vriendelijkheid van formulieren op webpagina&#39;s, en hoe de gebruikerservaring verbeterd kan worden door inline validatie toe te passen. Zelf liep ik al langer met een dergelijk idee rond en ik had daarbij al een specifiek formulier op Tweakers.net op het oog; namelijk ons registratieformulier. Naar aanleiding van het artikel op ALA heb ik besloten om dit eindelijk eens te realiseren  Lees verder &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3029/inline-validatie-met-een-ajax-sausje.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3029</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 validation (and caveats)</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/2031/ipv6-validation-(and-caveats).html</link>
			<description>Recently we got a request to also match IPv6 addresses as a host-part for our auto-links. Basically this seemed pretty straight-forward, but it proved that actually validating an IPv6 address is quite difficult. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/2031/ipv6-validation-(and-caveats).html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/2031</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JSMin+ version 1.3</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1856/jsmin+-version-13.html</link>
			<description>Version 1.3 of JSMin+ is available for download. This version fixes some issues with empty bodies in if/else and loop-constructs, and it fixes precedence issues in nested ternaries (which actually is a Narcissus bug which has been reported here). Furthermore it has some minification improvements. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>7</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1856/jsmin+-version-13.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1856</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 22:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JSMin+ version 1.2</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1706/jsmin+-version-12.html</link>
			<description>Version 1.2 of JSMin+ is available for download. This version fixes PHP crashes in some versions (notably 5.2.9) on JS files with large comments or strings and handles if-else statements in a safer way. Overall the output size has been improved. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>7</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1706/jsmin+-version-12.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1706</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JSMin+ version 1.1</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1681/jsmin+-version-11.html</link>
			<description>Version 1.1 of JSMin+ is available for download. This version has improved performance and fixes some issues. If you use labels in your javascripts you are strongly adviced to use this version to re-minify your scripts. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>7</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1681/jsmin+-version-11.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1681</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A new javascript minifier: JSMin+</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1665/a-new-javascript-minifier-jsmin+.html</link>
			<description>For some time we have been looking for ways to minify the javascript and CSS files for Tweakers.net but were unable to find the right tool for this. If finding the right tool takes too much time there is only one other option: create your own tool, which is exactly what we did. Even better: we are releasing this tool to the public so you can use it too! Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1665/a-new-javascript-minifier-jsmin+.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1665</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
