<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<copyright>Copyright 1998-2012 Tweakers.net</copyright>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:15:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://tweakers.net/reviews/76</docs>
		<description>Tweakblogs.net is the weblog service provided by Tweakers.net, the largest hardwaresite and techcommunity in the Netherlands.</description>
		
		<language>en</language>
		<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/cat/127</link>
		<title>Crisp&#39;s blog - Internet</title>
		<webMaster>frontpage@tweakers.net</webMaster>
		<item>
			<title>Do you have javascript disabled?</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5426/do-you-have-javascript-disabled.html</link>
			<description>Every time you create a new hot DHTML AJAX Web2.0 HTML5 feature that at least involves a certain amount of javascript the same question arises: how do you build this feature with accessibility in mind? Is it a very important feature and should you cater to the lowest denominator and build using progressive enhancement, or can you use graceful degradation and/or supply a lower-level alternative, or is it just a gimmick and is it ok to ignore part of your audience? Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5426/do-you-have-javascript-disabled.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/5426</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are you watching the banners? At least the banners are watching you!</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4860/are-you-watching-the-banners-at-least-the-banners-are-watching-you!.html</link>
			<description>When was the last time you looked at a banner? Provided you don&#39;t already use a banner blocker, and I don&#39;t mean just noticed that there was a banner (some flashing moving thing on top of the page or on the side, or maybe even covering the content you were just about to start reading and making you race for the close button), but really looked at it? Maybe even clicked it? And if you did, do you look at banners all the time? Well, don&#39;t worry if you don&#39;t; at least banners know when you are not looking, and they&#39;re telling it to the advertisers. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4860/are-you-watching-the-banners-at-least-the-banners-are-watching-you!.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4860</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The internet anno 2010: all about the money?</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4424/the-internet-anno-2010-all-about-the-money.html</link>
			<description>Sometimes when I look back at my internet career I get a feeling of dismay, and it&#39;s not only about my career itself but also about the internet as a whole. What started out as an exciting new technology with endless possibilities now only seems to revolve around advertisements and SEO in order to attract as many visitors as possible in order to maximize the income on said former advertisements. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>1</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4424/the-internet-anno-2010-all-about-the-money.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4424</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The real reason Apple and Microsoft are embracing &#39;HTML5&#39;</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4090/the-real-reason-apple-and-microsoft-are-embracing-html5.html</link>
			<description>Just the other day Microsoft has chimed in with Apple in its fight against Adobe&#39;s Flash calling it &#39;proprietary&#39; and &#39;not-open&#39; and pushing forward &#39;HTML5&#39; as the technology of the future. Both posts seem to focus on video on the web and it is striking that they both mention H.264 as the codec of choice, a codec that is neither free nor open and has little to do with HTML5 itself. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>8</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4090/the-real-reason-apple-and-microsoft-are-embracing-html5.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/4090</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 validation - more caveats</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3049/ipv6-validation-more-caveats.html</link>
			<description>Last week I was taking a nice hot bath while reading the Regular Expression Cookbook by Jan Goyvaerts and Steven Levithan. Really, there is no better way of relaxing  But then chapter 7.17 made me jump out of the tub, rush to my computer, and - while still wet - start typing the regular expression printed on page 387. The chapter was called &#39;Matching IPv6 Addresses&#39;. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>1</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3049/ipv6-validation-more-caveats.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/3049</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 validation (and caveats)</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/2031/ipv6-validation-(and-caveats).html</link>
			<description>Recently we got a request to also match IPv6 addresses as a host-part for our auto-links. Basically this seemed pretty straight-forward, but it proved that actually validating an IPv6 address is quite difficult. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/2031/ipv6-validation-(and-caveats).html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/2031</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IE8&#39;s standards compatibility promise</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1248/ie8s-standards-compatibility-promise.html</link>
			<description>Some time ago Microsoft made a 180 turn on their decision to make IE7 rendering mode the default for IE8. This seemed to be a commitment to standards compliance which gained them renewed trust from a lot of parties. But now that IE8&#39;s appearance is near, how do they keep up to that promise? Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>8</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1248/ie8s-standards-compatibility-promise.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1248</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AdBlock sucks!</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1190/adblock-sucks!.html</link>
			<description>Not only does it deprive legitimate businesses from their primary source of income, it also puts a burden on development teams because of the number of false bug reports when some user was blocking a little too much. Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>1</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1190/adblock-sucks!.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/1190</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The versioning switch&#39;s default is incorrect</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/509/the-versioning-switchs-default-is-incorrect.html</link>
			<description>In fact, the whole versioning switch idea is bad to begin with. If you still don&#39;t understand why after my previous blog-entries and after having read for instance Jeremy Keith&#39;s reasoning on AListApart (and failed to see the flaws in Jeffrey Zeldman&#39;s entry) here&#39;s a break-down of the arguments against the versioning switch and against the proposed default (== IE7 mode): Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>8</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/509/the-versioning-switchs-default-is-incorrect.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/509</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:53:34 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Using the HTML5 doctype prematurely &#34;considered harmful&#34;</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/434/using-the-html5-doctype-prematurely-considered-harmful.html</link>
			<description>There has been a lot of fuss around Microsoft&#39;s ludicrous idea of freezing IE into IE7&#39;s quirksmode rendering for the (un)foreseeable future unless you specify some proprietary meta-tag in all your documents. There was however a tiny shimmer of good faith in this huge anti-competitive move when Chris Wilson, MSIE&#39;s productmanager, offered that this lock-in might not affect documents using some new doctype or mimetype that is currently unsupported by IE.

By the way, the &#38;quot;considered harmful&#38;quot; in the title is intentional even though it has been abused as a populistic phrase throughout the years: it seems fitting since no one less than Eric Meyer once wrote an essay on the subject of why &#38;quot;considered harmful&#38;quot; can be considered harmful by itself  Read more &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>8</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/434/using-the-html5-doctype-prematurely-considered-harmful.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/434</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:13:38 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Banners en browsing performance impact</title>
			<link>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/204/banners-en-browsing-performance-impact.html</link>
			<description>Het zal niemand verbazen dat reclame op websites (banners) een negatieve impact hebben op de &#39;browsing performance&#39;: je moet immers meer data ophalen en dat moet ook nog eens allemaal gerendered en getoond worden door je browser. Lees verder &#38;raquo;</description><dc:creator>crisp</dc:creator>
			<category>6</category>
			<comments>http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/204/banners-en-browsing-performance-impact.html#reacties</comments>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crisp.tweakblogs.net/blog/204</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
